SHK-Quotes
  • KPMG GENDER DISCRIMINATION PAY, PROMOTION AND PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

    In June 2011, Class Representative Donna Kassman filed a lawsuit against KPMG to remedy KPMG’s systemic discrimination in pay and promotion, discrimination based on pregnancy, and chronic failure to properly investigate and resolve complaints of discrimination and harassment. Later that same year, the lawsuit was amended to add Named Plaintiffs from around the country who had experienced discrimination similar to what Ms. Kassman had suffered. Read More

  • BOSTON SCIENTIFIC GENDER DISCRIMINATION PAY AND PROMOTION DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

    In March 2015, class representatives Denise Fretter and Maria Korsgaard filed a $50 million nationwide class and collective action against the Valencia, CA-based medical device manufacturer, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (BSNC), in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The Plaintiffs allege systemic violations of the Equal Pay Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act stemming from the company’s treatment of women who worked in its sales force hierarchy. Read More

  • NOVARTIS/ALCON GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL PAY ACT COLLECTIVE ACTION

    In March 2015, Plaintiffs Elyse Dickerson and Dr. Susan Orr filed a Title VII and Equal Pay Act case against the pharma giant Novartis and its Alcon division in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit seeks $110 million, company-wide changes to redress gender discrimination, and individual relief.  Read More

  • DAIICHI SANKYO GENDER PAY, PROMOTION AND PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

    In February 2013, six current and former female pharmaceutical sales professionals filed a $100 million class and collective action gender discrimination lawsuit against Daiichi Sankyo in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging discrimination in pay, promotion and other terms and conditions of employment based on gender, pregnancy and family responsibilities. Read More

  • FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., AND FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. GENDER PAY, PROMOTION AND PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

    This $100 million gender discrimination employment class action was initially filed in July 2012 against New York-based Forest Laboratories, Inc., and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the Southern District of New York. Now amended to include eleven plaintiffs as class representatives on behalf of a class of thousands of female Sales Representatives, the complaint describes how the compensation and careers of female Sales Representatives at Forest have been and continue to be adversely affected by the company’s discriminatory policies and practices. A subset of the Plaintiffs also allege discrimination against women based on pregnancy and maternity. Read More

  • MERCK GENDER PAY, PROMOTION AND PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

    This gender discrimination class action against pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co., Inc. was originally filed by Plaintiff Kelli Smith in May 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. In January 2014, four additional class representatives from around the country joined the suit as plaintiffs alleging pay, promotion and pregnancy discrimination against the company.  Read More

  • PUBLICIS GROUPE AND MSL GENDER PAY, PROMOTION AND PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

    Sanford Heisler filed a class action gender discrimination lawsuit on behalf of women working at Publicis Group and MSLGroup since 2008 alleging pay and promotion discrimination. The suit also alleges discriminatory terminations, demotions and job reassignments of female employees following maternity leave. Read More

  • GARDA GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASE

    In February 2015, former Vice President of Business Process and Integration Nicole Watson filed a complaint alleging gender discrimination and sexual harassment against Garda, a company that provides armored trucks throughout the United States and touts itself as being a “global leader in comprehensive security and risk management.” The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.  Read More